Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 49(4): 1835-1844, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933048

RESUMO

PURPOSE: For geriatric hip fracture patients, the decision between surgery and palliative, non-operative management is made through shared decision making (SDM). For this conversation, a physician must be familiar with the patient's goals of care (GOC). These are predominantly unknown for hip fracture patients and challenging to assess in acute setting. The objective was to explore these GOC of geriatric patients in case of a hip fracture. METHODS: An expert panel gathered possible outcomes after a hip fracture, which were transformed into statements where participants indicated their relative importance on a 100-point scoring scale during interviews. These GOC were ranked using medians and deemed important if the median score was 90 or above. Patients were aged 70 years or older with a hip contusion due to similarities with the hip fracture population. Three cohorts based on frailty criteria and the diagnosis of dementia were made. RESULTS: Preserving cognitive function, being with family and being with partner scored in all groups among the most important GOC. Both non-frail and frail geriatric patients scored return to pre-fracture mobility and maintaining independence among the most important GOC, where proxies of patients with a diagnosis of dementia scored not experiencing pain as the most important GOC. CONCLUSION: All groups scored preserving cognitive function, being with family and being with partner among the most important GOC. The most important GOC should be discussed when a patient is presented with a hip fracture. Since patients preferences vary, a patient-centered assessment of the GOC remains essential.


Assuntos
Demência , Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Idoso , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Dor , Comunicação , Avaliação Geriátrica
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 47(8): E353-E361, 2022 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35500086

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and provide an overview of reported predictive factors on initial in-brace correction in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Brace therapy is the best proven non-surgical treatment for IS. There is strong evidence that lack of initial in-brace correction is associated with brace treatment failure. To improve initial in-brace corrections and subsequently long-term brace treatment success, knowledge about factors influencing initial in-brace correction is a prerequisite. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Cinahl, and Cochrane in November 2020. Studies which reported factors influencing initial in-brace correction in IS patients treated with brace therapy were considered eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Of the 4562 potentially eligible articles identified, 28 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Nine studies (32%) were classified as high quality studies and the remaining 19 studies (68%) as low quality. Thirty-four different reported factors were collected from the included studies. Strong evidence was found for increased curve flexibility as favorable predictive factor for initial in-brace correction. Moderate evidence was found for thoracolumbar or lumbar curve pattern as favourable predictive factor, and double major curve pattern as unfavourable predictive factor for initial in-brace correction. Also moderate evidence was found that there is no significant difference on initial in-brace correction between computer-aided design and manufacturing systems (CAD/CAM) braces with or without finite element models (FEM) simulation, and braces fabricated using the conventional plaster-cast. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review indicate that increased curve flexibility is strongly associated with increased initial in-brace correction.Level of Evidence: 1.


Assuntos
Braquetes , Escoliose , Moldes Cirúrgicos , Simulação por Computador , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Humanos , Escoliose/diagnóstico , Escoliose/terapia
3.
BMJ Open ; 8(1): e019596, 2018 01 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331975

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The most common surgical treatment of traumatic spine fractures is through a posterior approach using pedicle screws and rods. Postoperative treatment protocols including the use of postoperative orthoses however differ between hospitals and surgeons. A three-point hyperextension orthosis is designed to support proper posture and unload the anterior column. Some motion remains when wearing an orthosis, and its main value in postoperative treatment is therefore believed to be pain relief and patient confidence. This could consequently shorten recovery time. On the other hand, an orthosis could also lead to muscle weakness and slow down recovery. Any orthosis-related complications might also be avoided. Additionally, recent studies on conservative fracture treatment show no difference in radiological outcomes with or without an orthosis. To date, no randomised studies have been performed on the use of postoperative orthoses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients undergoing posterior fixation with pedicle screws for a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture (T7-L4) will be included in this randomised controlled multicentre non-inferiority trial. Forty-six patients will be randomised 1:1 to one of the two parallel groups; one group will wear a postoperative orthosis for 6 weeks followed by 6 weeks of weaning and one group will not wear an orthosis. The primary outcome is pain at 6 weeks reported on the Numerical Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes consist of pain on other moments, analgesic use, complications and length of hospital stay, quality of life (EuroQuol 5 Dimensions), back pain-related function (Oswestry Disability Index) and radiological outcomes with a follow-up of 1 year. Orthosis compliance is monitored weekly in the orthosis group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional review board (METc VUmc) approved this study on 11 October 2016 under case number 2016.389. After completion of the trial, the results will be offered to an international scientific journal for peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03097081 and NTR6285; Pre-results.


Assuntos
Braquetes , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Parafusos Pediculares , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Dor Musculoesquelética , Período Pós-Operatório , Postura , Projetos de Pesquisa , Vértebras Torácicas , Suporte de Carga , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...